Find 45 Fantastic Fights Of The Century at Amazon
| Most helpful customer reviews 20 of 21 people found the following review helpful. I realize, the earlier you go back, the footage will be horrible, limited camera views, but, its part of Boxing history, so, show it. The footage is fair to good quality on most of them. Lots of fights on here too, from 1909 to the 1950s, maybe one from the early 60′s. More DVD’s like this, need to be released. I wouldn’t call this the best, I’d call this one, the only one, with a more complete history of the early fights. Some of these might be considered rare fights, that you might not find on other DVDs. I say its worth the 10 dollars. Buy it. 17 of 19 people found the following review helpful. Definaltey worth the buy if you like the classic fights. 6 of 6 people found the following review helpful. For instance, you get the Will o’ the Wisp against rough-housing Sandy Saddler; it was the first time I’d ever seen Pep fight, and he’s simply mesmerizing (watch him and you’ll see where Orlando Canizales picked up his style). Jersey Joe Walcott’s on this DVD too – he does the herky-jerky, slips and slides and shuffles his way past Joe Louis (though Louis gets the nod – go figure!). And the amazing Kid Chocolate’s on the menu as well. One of the truly great fights though, the 1909 Clash of the Titans between Stanley Ketchel and Jack Johnson, – a vicious middleweight against a skilful heavyweight – is extremely disappointing. After several minutes of the fight – suddenly, magically, inexplicably – we see Johnson down and Ketchel on his back – without seeing the punches that did the damage! Additionally, the Walcott-Louis fight included here needs redoing – Walcott’s torso disappears into the dark background of the crowd so that Louis appears to be fighting just a pair of boxing trunks with legs attached! And this DVD also gives you the Tunney-Dempsey fights twice – why? No man can say! All in all, it’s worth buying to have some of the old-time greats on your DVD shelf, but don’t expect too much from either the film quality or the footage. |





